Multiple Sclerosis

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Riazi, A
Right arrow Articles by Hobart, J C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Riazi, A
Right arrow Articles by Hobart, J C
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Multiple Sclerosis, Vol. 10, No. 1, 61-66 (2004)
DOI: 10.1191/1352458504ms986oa

Self-efficacy predicts self-reported health status in multiple sclerosis

A Riazi

Neurological Outcome Measures Unit, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK, a.riazi{at}ion.ucl.ac.uk

A J Thompson

Neurological Outcome Measures Unit, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK

J C Hobart

Neurological Outcome Measures Unit, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK, Peninsula Medical School, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth PL6 8BX, UK

Self-efficacy is a belief that one can competently cope with a challenging situation. If self-efficacy is a strong predicto r of health status in multiple sclerosis (MS), it may be an important area to target in clinical practice, as such beliefs may be modifiable. The aim of this study was to examine the predictive value of self-efficacy on self-reported health status in MS. Eighty-nine people with MS completed the Multiple Sclerosis Self-efficacy Scale (MSSE function and control scales), the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29), and the Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (MSWS-12) at two time points: 1) admission to an inpatient rehabilitation unit (n=43) or for steroid treatment for relapses (n=46); and 2) discharge (rehabilitation group) or six weeks later (steroid group). Multiple regression analyses examined whether baseline and changes in self-efficacy predict changes in self-reported health status. Both baseline and changes in self-efficacy were strong and independent predictors of changes in health status (P-values ranged from 0.025 to B-0.001). That is, pretreatment self-efficacy scores and increases in self-efficacy scores from baseline to follow-up (improvement), were significantly associated with decreases (improvement) in perceived walking ability and physical and psychological impact of MS. The findings suggest that self-efficacy predicts improvement in health status and that self-efficacy would be an important domain to measure and manage actively in education and rehabilitation programs.

Key Words: health status • multiple sclerosis • outcomes • self-efficacy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
C. M Stretton, N. K Latham, K. N Carter, A. C Lee, and C. S Anderson
Determinants of physical health in frail older people: the importance of self-efficacy
Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 2006; 20(4): 357 - 366.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Chronic IllnessHome page
C. Heffernan and C. Jenkinson
Review Paper: Measuring outcomes for neurological disorders: a review of disease-specific health status instruments for three degenerative neurological conditions
Chronic Illness, June 1, 2005; 1(2): 131 - 142.
[Abstract] [PDF]