This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Vaney, C Articles by Wade, D T Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Vaney, C Articles by Wade, D T Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

SaGA S, the Short and Graphic A bility Score: an alternative scoring method for the motor components of the Multiple Sclerosis Functional C omposite

Neurologische Rehabilitations-und MS-Abteilung, Berner Klinik, Montana, Switzerland, vaney.claude{at}bernerklinik.ch

S Vaney

Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale Lausanne (EPFL), Switzerland

D T Wade

Oxford Centre for Enablement, Windmill Road, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK

The timed performances of the 10-m timed walk (TMTW) and the nine-ho le peg test (NHPT) of 881 consecutive patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) undergoing a rehabilitation stay, were expressed as a logarithmic function of time in two subscores to form a composite score called the Short and G raphic A bility Score (SaGA S). The subscores (sS) were constructed in such a way that any interval of 0.5 unit corresponds to a change of 25% in the tests. The SaGA S was computed as the mean of four subscores: SaGAS=(2x2-TMTWsS+NHPTsS right hand+NHPTsS left hand). With the aid of a nomogram, the timed values of the tests are easily transformed into the corresponding subscores, which are then displayed graphically to facilitate follow-up over time. The correlation coefficients between the SaGA S and the two motor components of the MS Functional C omposite (MSFC) (r =0.987), the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)(r = -0.83), the Nottingham EADL Index (r =0.80) and the Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI) (r =0.90) were all statistically significant (P B-0.001), supporting the validity of the measure. SaGA S had a similar sensitivity to the RMI, but was significantly more sensitive than the EDSS in detecting changes occurring during the rehabilitation stay (14.9% versus 5.0%; P B-0.001) and over a one-year follow-up (35.3% versus 19.7%; P B-0.001). C ompared with the motor components of the MSFC, with which it shares several features, SaGA S has several advantages: it does not depend on the stratification of the study population; it does not skew the results of the NHPT towards improvement at the lower end; and it offers an independent assessment of both hands. SaGA S is a simple, intuitive, nonphysician-based measure, which could provide consistent scoring in future clinical trials.

Key Words: EDSS • MSFC • multiple sclerosis • nine-hole peg test • timed 10-m walk

Multiple Sclerosis, Vol. 10, No. 2, 231-242 (2004)
DOI: 10.1191/1352458504ms1000oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Paltamaa, T. Sarasoja, E. Leskinen, J. Wikstrom, and E. Malkia Measuring Deterioration in International Classification of Functioning Domains of People With Multiple Sclerosis Who Are Ambulatory Physical Therapy, February 1, 2008; 88(2): 176 - 190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. de Groot, H. Beckerman, B. M. J. Uitdehaag, H. C. W. de Vet, G. J. Lankhorst, C. H. Polman, and L. M. Bouter The usefulness of evaluative outcome measures in patients with multiple sclerosis Brain, October 1, 2006; 129(10): 2648 - 2659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]