|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Overview of primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS): similarities and differences from other forms of MS, diagnostic criteria, pros and cons of progressive diagnosis
Alan Thompson
Department of Clinical Neurology, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK, a.thompson{at}ion.ucl.ac.uk
Patients with the primary progressive form of multiple sclerosis (PPMS) have a unique clinical course and demonstrate additional demographic and imaging features, which separate them from the relapsing/remitting form of the condition. Whether these features indicate a fundamental difference in the underlying patho genesis of the condition or simply reflect opposite ends of a clinical spectrum is unclear. What is clear, however, is that this form of MS provides a valuable model of progression, which has the potential to explain this most disabling component of the disease process. The lack of the hallmark relapses and remissions in PPMS poses diagnostic difficulties, some of which have been addressed by recently published diagnostic criteria. Following diagnosis, the need for information, specific to this form of MS, must be recognized and addressed.
Key Words: diagnostic criteria model of progression primary progressive MS
Multiple Sclerosis, Vol. 10, No. 3 suppl,
S2-S7 (2004)
DOI: 10.1191/1352458504ms1024oa

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z Khaleeli, J Sastre-Garriga, O Ciccarelli, D H Miller, and A J Thompson
Magnetisation transfer ratio in the normal appearing white matter predicts progression of disability over 1 year in early primary progressive multiple sclerosis
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry,
October 1, 2007;
78(10):
1076 - 1082.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Stankoff, S. Mrejen, A. Tourbah, B. Fontaine, O. Lyon-Caen, C. Lubetzki, and M. Rosenheim
Age at onset determines the occurrence of the progressive phase of multiple sclerosis
Neurology,
March 6, 2007;
68(10):
779 - 781.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J H Simon
Brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis: what we know and would like to know
Multiple Sclerosis,
November 1, 2006;
12(6):
679 - 687.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. M. Burwick, P. P. Ramsay, J. L. Haines, S. L. Hauser, J. R. Oksenberg, M. A. Pericak-Vance, S. Schmidt, A. Compston, S. Sawcer, R. Cittadella, et al.
APOE epsilon variation in multiple sclerosis susceptibility and disease severity: Some answers
Neurology,
May 9, 2006;
66(9):
1373 - 1383.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Tremlett, D. Paty, and V. Devonshire
The natural history of primary progressive MS in British Columbia, Canada
Neurology,
December 27, 2005;
65(12):
1919 - 1923.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Isoardo, N. Di Vito, M. Nobile, G. Benetton, and F. Fassio
X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and progressive-relapsing central demyelinating disease
Neurology,
November 22, 2005;
65(10):
1672 - 1673.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|