SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Multiple Sclerosis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Polman, C. H
Right arrow Articles by Reingold, S. C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Polman, C. H
Right arrow Articles by Reingold, S. C
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Multiple sclerosis diagnostic criteria: three years later

Chris H Polman

Department of Neurology, VU Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, ch.polman{at}vumc.nl

Jerry S Wolinsky

Department of Neurology, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA

Stephen C Reingold

Research Programs Department, National Multiple Sclerosis Society, New York, NY, USA

New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS) were developed by an International Panel in 2001 and have had wide distribution and discussion since publication. These provided the first formal incorporation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a diagnosis work-up for patients suspected of having MS. The so-called McDonald criteria have been studied in retrospective and prospective analyses for sensitivity, specificity and utility, and have been proven to compare favourably or to be an improvement upon prior MS diagnostic criteria. The purpose of the current review is to present and evaluate the key studies that have been performed using the McDonald criteria since 2001 and to set the stage for an upcoming re-evaluation of the new criteria based on data-driven information gathered since their development.

Key Words: diagnosis • magnetic resonance imaging • multiple sclerosis • outcomes

Multiple Sclerosis, Vol. 11, No. 1, 5-12 (2005)
DOI: 10.1191/1352458505ms1135oa
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
J K Swanton, K Fernando, C M Dalton, K A Miszkiel, A J Thompson, G T Plant, and D H Miller
Modification of MRI criteria for multiple sclerosis in patients with clinically isolated syndromes
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, July 1, 2006; 77(7): 830 - 833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Advertisement