This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Mohr, D. C Articles by Merluzzi, N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mohr, D. C Articles by Merluzzi, N. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A preliminary report on a skills-based telephone-administered peer support programme for patients with multiple sclerosis

Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA, dmohr{at}itsa.ucsf.edu

Heather Burke

Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA

Victoria Beckner

Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA

Natalia Merluzzi

Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA

Objective: Peer-support interventions have shown no statistically significant or clinically meaningful effect on quality of life (QOL) or depressive symptoms for multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. Peer-support interventions for MS generally provide support but no skills training. The aim of this study was to evaluate a brief telephone-administered skills-training model of peer-support for patients with MS. Methods: Sixteen patients with MS showing signs of moderate distress received eight sessions of telephone-administered peer support (TAPS). TAPS is a manualized programme administered by peer-support counsellors diagnosed with MS. Using a workbook, peer-support counsellors teach skills to manage distress and MS symptoms. Subjective depression was assessed using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale while objective depression was rated using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. QOL was measured preand post-treatment using the SF-36. Results: The participants showed significant improvements on both the CESD (p=0.04) and the HRSD (p=0.01). Overall QOL improved significantly (p=0.045), however this was not reflected in either the Physical Health composite score or the Mental Health Composite Scale (p-0.17). Conclusions: These findings suggest that TAPS may prove to be an efficacious peer-support model for patients with MS.

Key Words: depression • disease management • multiple sclerosis • peer support • quality of life

Multiple Sclerosis, Vol. 11, No. 2, 222-226 (2005)
DOI: 10.1191/1352458505ms1150oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?