SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Multiple Sclerosis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ford, H. L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ford, H. L
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The effect of consent guidelines on a multiple sclerosis register

Helen L Ford

Department of Neurology, St James’s University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK, Helen.Ford{at}leedsth.nhs.uk

Background The 1998 Data Protection Act and guidelines from the General Medical Council on informed consent have caused concern for medical researchers and particularly those involved in the management of disease registers.

Objective The aim of this study was to determine rates of consent for a multiple sclerosis (MS) community-based register and to investigate authorization bias by examining the characteristics of those refusing consent.

Methods A consent letter was developed with the advice and support of an advisory group which included people with MS. All people with MS on the prevalent register (n=820) were informed about the register and its purposes and asked to indicate whether they would like their details to be removed from the register.

Results Thirty-four (4.1%) people with MS asked for their details to be removed from the register. There was a significant difference in disease course in this group with more patients with benign relapsing-remitting disease compared to the prevalent population. There was no significant difference in age or sex distribution. The proportion of people not giving consent was similar to a local stroke register. Prospectively all new patients have given written informed consent.

Conclusion Patients refusing consent may have different disease characteristics than those who consent. The potential for response bias needs to be considered in the development of a UK MS register.

Key Words: authorization bias • informed consent • multiple sclerosis register

Multiple Sclerosis, Vol. 12, No. 1, 104-107 (2006)
DOI: 10.1191/135248506ms1257sr


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Med. EthicsHome page
W Baird, R Jackson, H Ford, N Evangelou, M Busby, P Bull, and J Zajicek
Holding personal information in a disease-specific register: the perspectives of people with multiple sclerosis and professionals on consent and access
J. Med. Ethics, February 1, 2009; 35(2): 92 - 96.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement