|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Measuring and evaluating interferon b-induced antibodies in patients with multiple sclerosis
C Ross
Institute for Inflammation Research, Rigshospitalet University Hospital, Copenhagen
K M Clemmesen
Institute for Inflammation Research, Rigshospitalet University Hospital, Copenhagen
P S Sørensen
Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet University Hospital, Copenhagen
N Koch-Henriksen
Aalborg Hospital, Ålborg, Department of Neurology, Denmark
K Bendtzen
Institute for Inflammation Research, Rigshospitalet University Hospital, Copenhagen
Author for correspondence: Klaus Bendtzen, Institute for Inflammation Research IIR 7521, Rigshospitalet University Hospital, 9 Blegdamsvej, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. E-mail: address: kben@mail.dk Administration of interferons (IFNs) may induce antibodies that interfere with therapeutic efficacy. We have optimized and validated methods for large-scale economic screening. Sera from patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) were investigated for binding antibody (BAb) by protein-G affinity-chromatography radioimmunoassay and a commercially available enzyme immunoassay (EIA). Neutralizing antibody (NAb) was investigated by cytopathic effect assays (CEA) using both fixed amount and serially diluted sera. BAb correlated with log10-transformed titres obtained by EIA (r=0.70, p<0.0001); the latter, however, failed to demonstrate low-level BAb. Comparison of clinical significance of NAb-positivity measured by biological assays with different sensitivities demonstrated an optimal odds ratio for relapse rate using 10 laboratory units (LU)/mL. Purification of IgG prior to CEA removed toxicity from toxic sera. The neutralizing capacity data correlated linearly with log10-transformed titres obtained by a Kawade 10-to-1 LU/mL CEA (r=0.77, p<0.0001). In conclusion, neutralizing capacity CEA utilizing a fixed amount of serum predicts differences in relapse rates in IFNß-treated MS patients and correlates with NAb titres of the 10-to- 1 LU/mL CEA. Neutralizing capacity CEA is less laborious and more economical than titre-based NAb assays and suitable for large-scale screenings of MS patients.
Key Words: binding antibodies clinical validation multiple sclerosis neutralizing antibodies radioimmunoassay screening methods therapeutic use type 1 interferon
Multiple Sclerosis, Vol. 12, No. 1,
39-46 (2006)
DOI: 10.1191/1352458506ms1272oa

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Hesse, F. Sellebjerg, and P. S. Sorensen
Absence of MxA induction by interferon {beta} in patients with MS reflects complete loss of bioactivity
Neurology,
August 4, 2009;
73(5):
372 - 377.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M Ravnborg, K Bendtzen, O Christensen, P. Jensen, D Hesse, M. Tovey, and P. Sorensen
Treatment with azathioprine and cyclic methylprednisolone has little or no effect on bioactivity in anti-interferon beta antibody-positive patients with multiple sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis,
March 1, 2009;
15(3):
323 - 328.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. van der Voort, A Kok, A Visser, C. Oudejans, M Caldano, F Gilli, A Bertolotto, C. Polman, and J Killestein
Interferon-{beta} bioactivity measurement in multiple sclerosis: feasibility for routine clinical practice
Multiple Sclerosis,
February 1, 2009;
15(2):
212 - 218.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Soelberg Sorensen
Review: Neutralizing antibodies against interferon-beta
Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders,
September 1, 2008;
1(2):
125 - 141.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C Gneiss, M Brugger, A Millonig, A Fogdell-Hahn, D Rudzki, J Hillert, T Berger, M Reindl, and F Deisenhammer
Comparative study of four different assays for the detection of binding antibodies against interferon-{beta}
Multiple Sclerosis,
July 1, 2008;
14(6):
830 - 836.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Garg, B. Weinstock-Guttman, K. Bhasi, J. Locke, and M. Ramanathan
An association between autoreactive antibodies and anti-interferon-{beta} antibodies in multiple sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis,
August 1, 2007;
13(7):
895 - 899.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Sorensen, N. Koch-Henriksen, and K. Bendtzen
Are ex vivo neutralising antibodies against IFN-{beta} always detrimental to therapeutic efficacy in multiple sclerosis?
Multiple Sclerosis,
June 1, 2007;
13(5):
616 - 621.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. A Farrell and G. Giovannoni
Measuring and management of Anti-Interferon Beta Antibodies in subjects with Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis,
June 1, 2007;
13(5):
567 - 577.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F Gilli, F Hoffmann, A Sala, F Marnetto, M Caldano, P Valentino, L Kappos, A Bertolotto, and R L. Lindberg
Qualitative and quantitative analysis of antibody response against IFN{beta} in patients with multiple sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis,
November 1, 2006;
12(6):
738 - 746.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Petersen, K. Bendtzen, N. Koch-Henriksen, M. Ravnborg, C. Ross, P. S. Sorensen, and The Danish Multiple Sclerosis Group
Persistence of neutralizing antibodies after discontinuation of IFN{beta} therapy in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis,
June 1, 2006;
12(3):
247 - 252.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|