SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Multiple Sclerosis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Storr, L K
Right arrow Articles by Ravnborg, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Storr, L K
Right arrow Articles by Ravnborg, M
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The efficacy of multidisciplinary rehabilitation in stable multiple sclerosis patients

L K Storr

Copenhagen Multiple Sclerosis Centre, the Neuroscience Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, DK 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark

P S Sørensen

Copenhagen Multiple Sclerosis Centre, the Neuroscience Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, DK 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark

M Ravnborg

The MS Hospital in Haslev, 4690 Haslev, Denmark

Objective To evaluate the short-term efficacy of multidisciplinary, inpatient rehabilitation of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients.

Methods A double-blind, randomized, parallel group design was used. The intervention group were offered comprehensive, multidisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation at the Haslev MS Hospital for an average of 35.5 days, while the control group received no treatment related to the study. All patients were examined in their homes twice with a 10-week interval. The rehabilitation of the intervention group started 2-3 weeks after the first examination and ended 2-3 weeks before the second examination. Impairment was assessed by the Multiple Sclerosis Impairment Scale and the Expanded Disability Status Scale. Disability was assessed by means of Guy’s Neurological Disability Scale. Two specific scales were used to assess upper limb function and ambulation: The Nine-Hole Peg Test and timed 10-metre walking. Patients’ own perception of bodily pain, bladder symptoms, spasticity, fatigue, impaired walking and transfers were recorded using visual analogue scales. Finally, quality of life was assessed using the Life Appreciation and Satisfaction Questionnaire and the Functional Assessment in Multiple Sclerosis.

Patients Two hundred and thirty-three patients were screened and of those 38 were included for treatment and 52 as controls.

Results We found no statistically significant differences between the two groups in any of the outcome measures.

Conclusion Although the study was underpowered, the negative outcome exposes the difficulties in quantitative analyses of the efficacy of multidisciplinary rehabilitation, which is liable to confounding factors such as variation in the indication for treatment, in the placebo effect, and in the reliability and responsiveness of the outcome measures.

Key Words: EDSS • disability • FAMS • impairment • inpatient • LASQ • MSIS • multiple sclerosis • Quality of Life • rehabilitation

Multiple Sclerosis, Vol. 12, No. 2, 235-242 (2006)
DOI: 10.1191/135248506ms1250oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
M Asano, D. Dawes, A Arafah, C Moriello, and N. Mayo
What does a structured review of the effectiveness of exercise interventions for persons with multiple sclerosis tell us about the challenges of designing trials?
Multiple Sclerosis, April 1, 2009; 15(4): 412 - 421.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Therapeutic Advances in Neurological DisordersHome page
I. S. Haussleiter, M. Brune, and G. Juckel
Review: Psychopathology in multiple sclerosis: diagnosis, prevalence and treatment
Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders, January 1, 2009; 2(1): 13 - 29.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
F Khan, J F Pallant, C Brand, and T J Kilpatrick
Effectiveness of rehabilitation intervention in persons with multiple sclerosis: a randomised controlled trial
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, November 1, 2008; 79(11): 1230 - 1235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
C. Wiles
Physiotherapy and related activities in multiple sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, August 1, 2008; 14(7): 863 - 871.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
D. Kos, E. Kerckhofs, G. Nagels, M.B. D'hooghe, and S. Ilsbroukx
Origin of Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis: Review of the Literature
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, February 1, 2008; 22(1): 91 - 100.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement