This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Deloire, M S. Articles by Brochet, B Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Deloire, M S. Articles by Brochet, B Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

How to detect cognitive dysfunction at early stages of multiple sclerosis?

EA 2966, Neurobiology of Myelin Disorders Laboratory, University Victor Segalen; and Department of Neurology, CHU, Bordeaux, France

M C Bonnet

EA 2966, Neurobiology of Myelin Disorders Laboratory, University Victor Segalen; and Department of Neurology, CHU, Bordeaux, France

E Salort

EA 2966, Neurobiology of Myelin Disorders Laboratory, University Victor Segalen; and Department of Neurology, CHU, Bordeaux, France

Y Arimone

INSERM, U657, Department of Pharmacology, University Victor Segalen, 33076 Bordeaux, Cedex, France

M Boudineau

EA 2966, Neurobiology of Myelin Disorders Laboratory, University Victor Segalen; and Department of Neurology, CHU, Bordeaux, France

K G Petry

EA 2966, Neurobiology of Myelin Disorders Laboratory, University Victor Segalen; and Department of Neurology, CHU, Bordeaux, France

B Brochet

EA 2966, Neurobiology of Myelin Disorders Laboratory, University Victor Segalen; and Department of Neurology, CHU, Bordeaux, France, bruno.brochet{at}chu-bordeaux.fr

Detecting cognitive dysfunction may be clinically important during the early stages of multiple sclerosis (MS). We assessed a self-report questionnaire on cognitive complaints and individual neuropsychological tests to select patients with early relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) who needed comprehensive cognitive testing.

Fifty-seven patients underwent neurological and neuropsychological assessment, including Rao’s Brief Repeatable Battery (BRB) and the complete SEP-59 Questionnaire, a French adaptation of the MSQOL-54, which contains four specific questions about self-perception of cognitive functions. Predictive values, specificity, sensitivity and accuracy of five individual neuropsychological tests-Selective Reminding Test, Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), Similarities Subtest, PASAT and Stroop Test-were calculated to predict cognitive impairment.

Only 10.5% of patients did not report any cognitive complaint, while most reported complaints. On the basis of cognitive performances, 59.7% of patients were classified as cognitively impaired, although only one cognitive score was correlated with cognitive complaints. Depressive symptoms and fatigue were associated with more cognitive complaints. Sensitivity of the SDMT to predict cognitive impairment was 74.2%, specificity was 76.9% and accuracy was 75.4%. Since, at this stage, patients’ cognitive complaints are already influenced by depression and fatigue and do not accurately reflect cognitive performances, the SDMT may help to select patients for testing with a more complete cognitive battery.

Key Words: cognition • multiple sclerosis • relapsing-remitting diagnosis

Multiple Sclerosis, Vol. 12, No. 4, 445-452 (2006)
DOI: 10.1191/1352458506ms1289oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L Strober, J Englert, F Munschauer, B Weinstock-Guttman, S Rao, and R. Benedict Sensitivity of conventional memory tests in multiple sclerosis: comparing the Rao Brief Repeatable Neuropsychological Battery and the Minimal Assessment of Cognitive Function in MS Multiple Sclerosis, September 1, 2009; 15(9): 1077 - 1084. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Benedict Standards for sample composition and impairment classification in neuropsychological studies of multiple sclerosis Multiple Sclerosis, July 1, 2009; 15(7): 777 - 778. [PDF]

				S Vanotti, R. Benedict, L Acion, F Caceres, and and VANEM Workgroup Validation of the Multiple Sclerosis Neuropsychological Screening Questionnaire in Argentina Multiple Sclerosis, February 1, 2009; 15(2): 244 - 250. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. A. Cohen Identification, causation, alleviation, and prevention of complications (ICAP): An approach to symptom and disability management in multiple sclerosis Neurology, December 9, 2008; 71(24_suppl_3): S14 - S20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B Brochet, M. Deloire, M Bonnet, E Salort-Campana, J. Ouallet, K. Petry, and V Dousset Should SDMT substitute for PASAT in MSFC? A 5-year longitudinal study Multiple Sclerosis, November 1, 2008; 14(9): 1242 - 1249. [Abstract] [PDF]