| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
No evidence for association of CTLA-4 gene polymorphisms with the risk of developing multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysisDepartment of Cell Biology and Biophysics, Faculty of Biology, University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis, Athens 15701, Greece, pbagos{at}biol.uoa.gr
Department of Cell Biology and Biophysics, Faculty of Biology, University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis, Athens 15701, Greece
Hellenic Centre for Diseases Control and Prevention, 3rd September 54, Athens 10433, Greece
Department of Cell Biology and Biophysics, Faculty of Biology, University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis, Athens 15701, Greece We conducted a meta-analysis concerning the association of cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) gene polymorphisms with the risk of developing multiple sclerosis (MS). We identified 18 eligible studies summarizing information about 3375 MS cases and 2930 healthy controls. Two polymorphisms were of interest: the exon 1 +49 A/G polymorphism (in 18 studies) and the promoter-318 C/T polymorphism (in 10 studies). Using random-effects methods we found no evidence for association of the various contrasts of genotypes (or allele frequencies) with the disease. There was significant between-studies heterogeneity that could not be explained by the ethnicity of the populations studied or by other summary measures (gender, disease course, latitude). The major finding of the meta-analysis, apart from the lack of an overall association, consists of detecting a significant time trend of the OR for the contrast of GA versus GG+AA genotypes of the exon 1 +49 A/G polymorphism. In particular, using cumulative meta-analysis we found that the large number of conflicting results on the subject was triggered by the early appearance of a highly significant published result (a study that indicated a significant association of the genotype with the disease).
Key Words: CTLA-4 genetic epidemiology meta-analysis multiple sclerosis polymorphism random effects
Multiple Sclerosis, Vol. 13, No. 2,
156-168 (2007) |
|||