This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1352458506074684v1 13/6/717    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Nielsen, J.M. Articles by Uitdehaag, B.M.J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nielsen, J.M. Articles by Uitdehaag, B.M.J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Classification of patients with a clinically isolated syndrome based on signs and symptoms is supported by magnetic resonance imaging results

Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, jm.nielsen{at}vumc.nl

B. Moraal

Department of Radiology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

C.H. Polman

Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

P. Poppe

Imaging Analysis Center (IAC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands

M. de Vos

Imaging Analysis Center (IAC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands

M.S. Freedman

The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada

L. Kappos

Kantonsspital, Basel, Switzerland

F. Barkhof

Imaging Analysis Center (IAC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands

L. Bauer

Schering AG, Berlin, Germany

C. Pohl

Schering AG, Berlin, Germany

R. Sandbrink

Schering AG, Berlin, Germany

H.-P. Hartung

Heinrich-Heine-Universitat, Duesseldorf, Germany

B.M.J. Uitdehaag

Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Background Recently, a clinical classification system was described to determine whether symptoms and signs of patients presenting with a first episode suggestive of multiple sclerosis (MS) indicate the presence of monofocal or multifocal disease.

Objectives To evaluate the value of this new classification system by comparing the results with those of simultaneously obtained magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans.

Methods The 487 patients, randomised in the BENEFIT study, were centrally assessed using the new system and classified as monofocal or multifocal, based on clinical information by two neurologists masked for the MRI results. MRI analyses were performed by expert readers masked for the clinical classification.

Results Patients classified as multifocal had more T2 hyperintense (median: 21 versus 15.5) and more T1 hypo-intense lesions (median: 2 versus 1) than those classified as monofocal. Patients classified at the local site as having evidence of a single clinical lesion, but reclassified centrally as having a clinical multifocal central nervous system presentation, had more T2 lesions than monofocal patients. In addition, patients with a multifocal presentation more often fulfilled the MRI criteria for dissemination in space, as incorporated in the International Panel (IP) diagnostic criteria for MS.

Conclusion These data provide justification for the recently proposed clinical classification system to be used in patients who present with a first episode suggestive of MS, in that `multifocal', based on symptoms and signs, is associated with more lesions on MRI. Multiple Sclerosis 2007; 13: 717-721. http://msj.sagepub.com

Key Words: multiple sclerosis • clinical classification • diagnostic guidelines • CIS (clinically isolated syndrome)

This version was published on July 1, 2007

Multiple Sclerosis, Vol. 13, No. 6, 717-721 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1352458506074684


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?