This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1352458507085061v1 1352458507085061v2 14/4/472    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Google Scholar Articles by Simó, M. Articles by Arányi, Z. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Simó, M. Articles by Arányi, Z. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Predictive role of evoked potential examinations in patients with clinically isolated optic neuritis in light of the revised McDonald criteria

Department of Neurology, Semmelweis University, Balassa u. 6, 1083 Budapest, Hungary, simomagdi{at}neur.sote.hu

Péter Barsi

MRI Research Center, Semmelweis University, Balassa u. 6, 1083 Budapest, Hungary

Zsuzsanna Arányi

Department of Neurology, Semmelweis University, Balassa u. 6, 1083 Budapest, Hungary

To analyse the sensitivity and role of somatosensory and motor evoked potentials (EP) in patients with a first episode of clinically isolated optic neuritis (ON) in predicting the development and course of multiple sclerosis (MS), 27 patients with ON underwent EP and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations at presentation. Follow-up MRI scans were also performed (mean: 20, range: 4—48 months). It was found that 2/27 patients did not fulfill the MRI (McDonald) and clinical criteria of MS upon follow-up and also had normal EP results. Abnormal EP results were found in 6/27 patients and all of them had follow-up MRI results fulfilling the revised McDonald criteria of MS; 4/6 patients in this group were also diagnosed as clinically definitive MS. The majority, 19/27 patients had normal EP results, but went on to develop MS based on follow-up MRI results and McDonald criteria. Of these patients, however, only 3/19 converted to clinically definitive MS as well. The baseline MRI was abnormal in similar proportions (4/6 and 12/19) in these last two groups of patients. Thus, abnormal EP examinations at the first episode of ON can be considered as a predictive factor only for the earlier clinical conversion to MS — in this respect, however, being more sensitive than the initial MRI — and as such they may contribute to the delineation of the patient group who may benefit from early immunomodulatory treatment. They do not however have a predictive value for the development of MS itself as diagnosed by the McDonald criteria. Multiple Sclerosis 2008; 14: 472—478. http://msj.sagepub.com

Key Words: evoked potentials • McDonald criteria • MRI • multiple sclerosis • optic neuritis

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?