SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Multiple Sclerosis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1352458507088156v1
14/6/804    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boster, A
Right arrow Articles by Khan, O
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boster, A
Right arrow Articles by Khan, O
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

research-article

Failure to develop multiple sclerosis in patients with neurologic symptoms without objective evidence

A Boster

Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Research Center, Department of Neurology, Wayne State University School Medicine, Detroit, USA; The Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, USA

C Caon

Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Research Center, Department of Neurology, Wayne State University School Medicine, Detroit, USA; The Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, USA

J Perumal

Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Research Center, Department of Neurology, Wayne State University School Medicine, Detroit, USA; The Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, USA

S Hreha

Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Research Center, Department of Neurology, Wayne State University School Medicine, Detroit, USA; The Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, USA

R Zabad

Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Research Center, Department of Neurology, Wayne State University School Medicine, Detroit, USA; Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Calgary, Canada

I Zak

The Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, USA; Department of Radiology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, USA

A Tselis

Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Research Center, Department of Neurology, Wayne State University School Medicine, Detroit, USA; The Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, USA

R Lisak

Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Research Center, Department of Neurology, Wayne State University School Medicine, Detroit, USA; The Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, USA

O Khan

Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Research Center, Department of Neurology, Wayne State University School Medicine, Detroit, USA; The Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, USA, okhan{at}med.wayne.edu

Background

Many patients referred to multiple sclerosis (MS) centers with symptoms suggestive of MS are found to have normal neurologic examinations, normal or non-specific brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan findings, and normal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Persistent symptoms often lead to multiple consultations and repeated diagnostic investigations. We performed a study to evaluate the diagnostic utility of repeated evaluations in patients with normal initial assessments and persistent neurologic symptoms.

Methods

143 patients were evaluated initially and 109 returned for a second evaluation after a mean interval of 4.4 years.

Results

All 143 patients had normal initial examinations, brain MRI scans, screening blood tests, and CSF studies. Spinal cord imaging was normal in all patients tested (cervical cord, n = 126; 88.1%; thoracic cord, n = 58; 40.6%). Evoked potential studies were abnormal in a small percentage of patients: visual evoked potentials, VEP (8.1%), somatosensory evoked potentials, SSEP (4.9%), and brainstem auditory evoked potentials, BAEP (2.8%). All follow-up patients (n = 109) had normal examinations and MRI scans. Repeat CSF studies (n = 35; 32.1%) and spinal cord imaging (cervical cord n = 57; 52.3%; thoracic cord n = 32; 29.4%) were normal in all follow-up patients tested. No patients at initial presentation or at follow-up fulfilled diagnostic criteria for MS.

Conclusions

Patients and clinicians may be reassured that persistent neurologic symptoms in the absence of objective clinical evidence do not lead to the development of MS. Costly serial investigations should be carefully considered, particularly in the presence of normal neurologic examination at follow-up.

Key Words: multiple sclerosis • CNS symptoms • demyelinating disease • diagnostic criteria

This version was published on July 1, 2008

Multiple Sclerosis, Vol. 14, No. 6, 804-808 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1352458507088156


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JWatch NeurologyHome page
Symptoms Without Signs Predict No MS
Journal Watch Neurology, September 2, 2008; 2008(902): 1 - 1.
[Full Text]



Advertisement