This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1352458508096215v1 15/1/81    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Mills, R. Articles by Tennant, A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mills, R. Articles by Tennant, A Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Rasch analysis of the Fatigue Severity Scale in multiple sclerosis

Department of Neurology, The Walton Centre for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Liverpool, UK rjm{at}crazydiamond.co.uk

CA Young

Department of Neurology, The Walton Centre for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Liverpool, UK

RS Nicholas

Department of Neurology, West London Neurosciences Centre, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK

JF Pallant

School of Rural Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

A Tennant

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, The General Infirmary at Leeds, Leeds, UK

Background

The 9-item, Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS-9) has been widely used as an outcome measure in multiple sclerosis (MS). Modern psychometric theory, in the form of the Rasch measurement model, has set new quality standards for outcome measures by appraising a broad range of measurement properties in addition to the reliability and validity emphasized by classical test theory.

Objective

To appraise the FSS-9 by application of the Rasch model.

Method

The FSS-9 was posted to patients with clinically definite MS in two centers in the United Kingdom. Analysis was based on 416 records (55% response).

Results

The 9-item scale failed to meet Rasch model expectations. Two items had poor discrimination across the scale, and two further items showed bias for factors such as age. Removal of these four items provided a valid 5-item Rasch scale that satisfied strict tests of unidimensionality.

Conclusion

Summating the nine items of the FSS-9 is invalid. Five items (FSS-5), which seem to be measuring the social impact of fatigue, provide a strictly unidimensional Rasch scale. Studies using the FSS-9 may need to be re-evaluated using the FSS-5, preferably using the Rasch transformed scores.

Key Words: fatigue • multiple sclerosis • Rasch • scale

This version was published on January 1, 2009

Multiple Sclerosis, Vol. 15, No. 1, 81-87 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1352458508096215


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?