SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Multiple Sclerosis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bar-Or, A
Right arrow Articles by Vollmer, T
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bar-Or, A
Right arrow Articles by Vollmer, T
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Multiple Sclerosis
Hazardous Substances DB
*NOVANTRONE
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

research-article

Serial combination therapy: is immune modulation in multiple sclerosis enhanced by initial immune suppression?

A Bar-Or

Montreal Neurological Institute Montreal, Quebec, Canada amit.bar-or{at}mcgill.ca

J Oger

Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Multiple Sclerosis Clinic and Brain Research Centre, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

E Gibbs

Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Multiple Sclerosis Clinic and Brain Research Centre, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

M Niino

Montreal Neurological Institute Montreal, Quebec, Canada

T Aziz

Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Multiple Sclerosis Clinic and Brain Research Centre, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

C Renoux

Montreal Neurological Institute Montreal, Quebec, Canada

S Alatab

Montreal Neurological Institute Montreal, Quebec, Canada

FD Shi

Barrow Neurology Institute of St Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

D Campagnolo

Barrow Neurology Institute of St Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

F Jalili

Montreal Neurological Institute Montreal, Quebec, Canada

S Rhodes

Barrow Neurology Institute of St Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

T Yamashita

Montreal Neurological Institute Montreal, Quebec, Canada

B Fan

Montreal Neurological Institute Montreal, Quebec, Canada

MS Freedman

Multiple Sclerosis Research Unit, The Ottawa Hospital General Campus, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada

H Panitch

Department of Neurology, Multiple Sclerosis Center, University of Vermont, College of Medical, Burlington, Vermont, USA

DL Arnold

Montreal Neurological Institute Montreal, Quebec, Canada

T Vollmer

Department of Neurology, Rocky Mountain MS Center, Anschutz Medical Center, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, USA

Background

Although the concept that an initial course of immune-suppression facilitates subsequent immune-modulation (such as Th1 to Th2 deviation) is attractive for several autoimmune diseases, such a mechanism for serial-combination therapy has never been formally demonstrated. Recently, brief mitoxantrone induction-chemotherapy followed by immune-modulation with glatiramer acetate (GA) was significantly more effective at reducing multiple sclerosis disease activity than with GA alone.

Objective

To examine whether the benefit of initial immune suppression with mitoxantrone before GA treatment is associated with more efficient immune modulation.

Methods

IgG1/IgG4 GA-reactive antibody profiles, previously established as markers of GA-induced Th2 immune-deviation, were prospectively measured in vivo in patients treated with GA alone or with mitoxantrone induction therapy followed by GA.

Results

Significant and sustained increase in IgG4 antibodies (and the anticipated reversal of the IgG1/IgG4 ratio) was seen in patients treated with GA alone. Combination therapy resulted in lesser IgG4 induction (and no reversal of IgG1/IgG4 ratio). Thus, the enhanced efficacy of mitoxantrone–GA combination regimen was associated with decreased, rather than increased, efficiency of shifting the GA-reactive IgG1/IgG4 antibody profile.

Conclusion

These results provide important insights into mechanisms of combination therapy and therapeutic strategies for autoimmune diseases.

Key Words: B cells • combination therapy • GA-reactive antibodies • glatiramer acetate • IgG1-4 • mitoxantrone • multiple sclerosis • Th2 immune-deviation

Multiple Sclerosis, Vol. 15, No. 8, 959-964 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1352458509106230


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement