This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Rossiter, D A Articles by Thompson, A J Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rossiter, D A Articles by Thompson, A J Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Multiple Sclerosis Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Integrated care pathways in multiple sclerosis rehabilitation: completing the audit cycle

Neurorehabilitation Unit, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London WC1 3BG, UK

A Edmondson

Audit Department, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London WC1 3BG, UK

R Al-Shahi

Neurorehabilitation Unit, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London WC1 3BG, UK

A J Thompson

Institute of Neurology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London WC1 3BG, UK

The rehabilitation of progressive neurological disorders, such as Multiple Sclerosis (MS) requires comprehensive, expert management which is demanding of both time and resources. Mechanisms to monitor and audit both process and outcome are therefore essential. Integrated care pathways (ICPs) which detail the expected interventions during a given episode of clinical care, provide such a mechanism. In this study three cohorts of patients (totalling 125 episodes) with clinically definite progressive MS underwent a rehabilitation programme audited through ICPs. The cohorts were similar in relation to disability and age. Variations (departures from the expected pathway) were documented for both the rehabilitation process and goal achievement. Duration of stay reduced from 28 days for the first cohort to 18 days for the third and there was greater multidisciplinary input and carer involvement over time. Goal achievement increased from 79% for the first cohort to 87% for the third and there was an increased emphasis on cognitive function and fatigue management in relation to goals set. ICPs provide an excellent mechanism for closing the audit loop and have the potential to play an important role in improving service provision in MS.

Key Words: Integrated Care Pathways (ICPs) • Multiple Sclerosis (MS) • rehabilitation • audit

Multiple Sclerosis, Vol. 4, No. 2, 85-89 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/135245859800400208


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J A Freeman, J C Hobart, E D Playford, B Undy, and A J Thompson Evaluating neurorehabilitation: lessons from routine data collection J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, May 1, 2005; 76(5): 723 - 728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J Thompson SYMPTOMATIC MANAGEMENT AND REHABILITATION IN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, December 1, 2001; 71(suppl_2): ii22 - ii27. [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Currie Researching care pathway development in the United Kingdom: Stage 1 Journal of Research in Nursing, September 1, 1999; 4(5): 378 - 384. [Abstract] [PDF]