SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Multiple Sclerosis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coles, A J
Right arrow Articles by Compston, D A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coles, A J
Right arrow Articles by Compston, D A.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Multiple Sclerosis
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Disease activity and the immune set in multiple sclerosis: blood markers for immunotherapy

A J Coles

University of Cambridge Neurology unit, Box 165, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QQ

M G Wing

University of Cambridge Neurology unit, Box 165, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QQ

D AS Compston

MRC Cambridge Centre for Brain Repair, University Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 2PY, UK

There is no established immunological marker of multiple sclerosis activity, which reflects the poor understanding of the immunopathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. Passive measurement of the levels of soluble inflammatory markers, whose half lives are usually measured in minutes and hours, can only indicate the extent of instantaneous inflammation, which is known to fluctuate in multiple sclerosis. We favour measurement of immune responses in vitro. As healthy individuals have T cell reactivities to myelin proteins that are postulated to be pathogenic in multiple sclerosis,1,2 we prefer non-antigen specific mitogen and recall antigen assays as immunological markers. We illustrate their use in the treatment of 27 patients with multiple sclerosis using a pulse of humanised anti-lymphocyte (CD52) antibody that caused prolonged T cell depletion. The mitogen-induced proliferation, and secretion of IFN-g, from peripheral blood mononuclear cells in vitro was significantly reduced after treatment, suggesting that immune responses had been modulated. Such observations will only gain credence as an outcome measure if they are shown to correlate with clinical or radiological measures of multiple sclerosis activity. Perhaps more importantly, aspects of the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis may be revealed by close immunological surveillance of patients undergoing experimental treatments.

Key Words: Campath-1H • multiple sclerosis • T-helper 1 • T-helper 2 • peripheral blood mononuclear cells • Graves' • autoimmune thyroiditis

Multiple Sclerosis, Vol. 4, No. 3, 232-238 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/135245859800400327


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




Advertisement