Multiple Sclerosis

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goodin, D. S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goodin, D. S
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Multiple Sclerosis, Vol. 4, No. 5, 444-451 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/135245859800400508

A questionnaire to assess neurological impairment in multiple sclerosis

Douglas S Goodin

University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, Box 0114 San Francisco, California 94143, USA

This study assessed the feasibility of using a self-report questionnaire to measure neurological impairment in multiple sclerosis (MS). Thirty patients aged 21-67 years participated. Each patient was examined and scored on three commonly used impairment scales; the extended disability status scale (EDSS), the neurologic rating scale (NRS) and the ambulation index (AI). Two other scales were also determined; the sum of the EDSS functional scores (SFS), and a five point scale rating functional status (FS). The physician also filled out a copy of the questionnaire based on interview and examination of the patient. All of these scores were determined and the physicial questionnaire filled out blind to the patient's answers on their self-report questionnaire. The first 15 consecutive patients served as the pilot group to develop a computer program to convert answers on the questionnaire into predicted scores on each of the five scales. The second 15 patients served as the independent test group to assess the validity of the computer program. Using this program, both patient and physician questionnaires accurately predicted (r40.87) the scores on each of the five scales measured manually. In addition, the scores on all five scales were highly cross-correlated (r40.85) suggesting that, in fact, each measured a similar attribute of MS (i.e., impairment). Therefore, the five scales were combined into a single measure, the mean disability score (MDS), which showed the highest correlations (r40.95) of any scale between the predicted scores and the actual scores determined by examination. The results of this study indicate that the self-report questionnaire is a valid measure of neurological impairment in MS and, thus, that it can be used to survey this health outcome in an MS population. Moreover, this questionnaire can be filled out by a physician (based directly on the neurological examination) and, together with the computer program for scoring each patient, can be used to provide consistent scoring in clinical trials.

Key Words: multiple sclerosis • neurological impairment • disability • questionnaire • survey • clinical trials


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
R. W Motl, E. McAuley, E. M. Snook, and J. A. Scott
Accuracy of two electronic pedometers for measuring steps taken under controlled conditions among ambulatory individuals with multiple sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, June 1, 2005; 11(3): 343 - 345.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
J Lechner-Scott, L Kappos, M Hofman, C H Polman, H Ronner, X Montalban, M Tintore, M Frontoni, C Buttinelli, M P Amato, et al.
Can the Expanded Disability Status Scale be assessed by telephone?
Multiple Sclerosis, April 1, 2003; 9(2): 154 - 159.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
R H. Benedict, F Munschauer, R Linn, C Miller, E Murphy, F Foley, and L Jacobs
Screening for multiple sclerosis cognitive impairment using a self-administered 15-item questionnaire
Multiple Sclerosis, February 1, 2003; 9(1): 95 - 101.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
E M Cheng, R D Hays, L W Myers, G W Ellison, M Beckstrand, and B G Vickrey
Factors related to agreement between self-reported and conventional Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores
Multiple Sclerosis, December 1, 2001; 7(6): 405 - 410.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
J. Bowen, L. Gibbons, A. Gianas, and G. H Kraft
Self-administered Expanded Disability Status Scale with functional system scores correlates well with a physician-administered test
Multiple Sclerosis, June 1, 2001; 7(3): 201 - 206.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
D. S Goodin and Northern California MS Study Group
Survey of multiple sclerosis in Northern California
Multiple Sclerosis, April 1, 1999; 5(2): 78 - 88.
[Abstract] [PDF]