SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Multiple Sclerosis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gasperini, C
Right arrow Articles by Filippi, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gasperini, C
Right arrow Articles by Filippi, M
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Autoimmune Diseases
*MRI Scans
*Multiple Sclerosis
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Intra-observer, inter-observer and inter-scanner variations in brain MRI volume measurements in multiple sclerosis

C Gasperini

Department of Neurology, Ospedale San Camillo-Forlanini, University `La Sapienza', Rome, Italy

M Rovaris

Neuroimaging Research Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Scientific Institute Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy

M P Sormani

Neuroimaging Research Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Scientific Institute Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy

S Bastianello

Department of Neuroscience, University `La Sapienza', Rome, Italy

C Pozzilli

Department of Neuroscience, University `La Sapienza', Rome, Italy

G Comi

Clinical Trials Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Scientific Institute Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy

M Filippi

Neuroimaging Research Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Scientific Institute Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy

Introduction: Measurement of brain volume on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans is regarded as an objective marker of multiple sclerosis (MS) severity with the potential to monitor treatment efficacy accurately. This study was performed to assess the variability of brain MRI volume measurements. Patients and methods: We studied nine patients with relapsing-remitting MS, who were imaged on two occasions (separated by an interval of 24 h) using two different MR scanners and fast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (fast-FLAIR) sequences. The whole brain volume computed from each image was measured three times by three observers using a seed-growing technique based on signal intensity thresholding. Intra-observer, inter-observer and inter-scanner variabilities were expressed as coefficients of variations (COVs). The inter-scanner variability included not only the intra-observer variation but also the repositioning variability and the variation in observed brain volume caused by different scanner hardware and sequence implementations. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in patients' brain volume values between observers (P=0.82) or between scanners (P=0.30). The mean intra-observer COV was 1.2% (s.e.=0.4%), the mean inter-observer COV was 1.8% (s.e.=0.8%) and the mean inter-scanner COV was 2.4% (s.e.=1.2%). The intra-observer variance was not statistically different from those found between observers (P=0.83) or scanners (P=0.44). Conclusion: The intra-observer variability in brain volume measurements found in this study was within the range of intra-observer variability found in previous studies. This study shows that the use of different observers and MR scanners has only a small influence on the measured brain volume and does not affect the reproducibility of this measurement greatly.

Key Words: multiple sclerosis • magnetic resonance imaging • brain volume • measurement variations

Multiple Sclerosis, Vol. 7, No. 1, 27-31 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/135245850100700106


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
S. Schach, M. Scholz, J.S. Wolinsky, and L. Kappos
Pooled historical MRI data as a basis for research in multiple sclerosis - a statistical evaluation
Multiple Sclerosis, May 1, 2007; 13(4): 509 - 516.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Gen PsychiatryHome page
D. Velakoulis, S. Wood, M. Wong, P. McGorry, A. Yung, L. Phillips, D. Smith, W. Brewer, T. Proffitt, P. Desmond, et al.
Amygdala Volume Status Might Reflect Dominant Mode of Emotional Information Processing--Reply
Arch Gen Psychiatry, February 1, 2007; 64(2): 252 - 253.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
J. Sharma, M. P. Sanfilipo, R. H. B. Benedict, B. Weinstock-Guttman, F. E. Munschauer III, and R. Bakshi
Whole-Brain Atrophy in Multiple Sclerosis Measured by Automated versus Semiautomated MR Imaging Segmentation
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2004; 25(6): 985 - 996.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement