SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Multiple Sclerosis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coyle, P.
Right arrow Articles by Hartung, H-P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coyle, P.
Right arrow Articles by Hartung, H-P.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Multiple Sclerosis
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Use of interferon beta in multiple sclerosis: rationale for early treatment and evidence for dose- and frequency-dependent effects on clinical response

PK Coyle

Department of Neurology, SUNY at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York 11794, USA

H-P. Hartung

Department of Neurology, Karl Franzens University, Graz A-8036, Austria

The current approach to the use of interferon (IFN) beta in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) is, in general, conservative. However, recent findings about early events in MS and data on dose-response relationships with IFN beta indicate that such an approach may be suboptimal. Four lines of evidence suggest that delays in the initiation of therapy with IFN beta may be detrimental: I) axonal damage secondary to inflammation starts very early in the course of MS; 2) pathological events occurring early in MS are predictive of the future course of the disease; 3) inflammatory activity in relapsing MS is not confined to episodes of clinical impairment, but often starts before the first such episode and generally continues during remissions; and 4) the immune-mediated activity that underlies MS may become more difficult to control as the disease progresses. An early treatment strategy is also supported by data from two recently published clinical studies. In addition, preclinical and clinical results suggest that the beneficial effects of IFN may be dose- and frequency-dependent Taken together, these findings indicate that treatment with IFN beta should be started as early as possible in the course of MS, and suggest that, in order to maximize patient benefit, the highest possible dose of IFN beta should be chosen. Multiple Sclerosis (2002) 8, 2-9

Key Words: Key words: axonal damage • disease management • disease progression • dose-response relationship • drug • inflammation • interferon beta • multiple sclerosis • relapsing-remitting • treatmeni outcome

Multiple Sclerosis, Vol. 8, No. 1 suppl, 2-9 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/135245850200800102


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement