SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Multiple Sclerosis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stenager, E.
Right arrow Articles by Koch-Henriksen, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stenager, E.
Right arrow Articles by Koch-Henriksen, N.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The risk of multiple sclerosis in nurses: a population-based epidemiological study

Egon Stenager

Danish MS Registry and MS Clinic, Esbjerg and Vejle, Denmark, est{at}ribeamt.dk

Henrik Brønnum-Hansen

Danish MS Registry and National Institute of Public Health, Copenhagen, Denmark

Nils Koch-Henriksen

Danish MS Registry and Department of Neurology, Aalborg, Denmark

The incidence of multiple sclerosis (MS) in nurses during the period 1980-1996 was calculated in a nationwide study. The cohort consisted of 69 428 nurses, 2185 men and 67243 women. Sixty (two men and 58 women) with definite MS were observed, whereas 69.3 were expected. We found no significant difference between the observed and expected number of MS cases (standardized incidence ratio =0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-1.12).

Key Words: aetiology • cohort • epidemiology • infection • multiple sclerosis • nurse

Multiple Sclerosis, Vol. 9, No. 3, 299-301 (2003)
DOI: 10.1191/1352458503ms919oa
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
A-M Landtblom, M Tondel, P Hjalmarsson, U Flodin, and O Axelson
The risk for multiple sclerosis in female nurse anaesthetists: a register based study.
Occup. Environ. Med., June 1, 2006; 63(6): 387 - 389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mult SclerHome page
E. Stenager, H. Bronnum-Hansen, and N. Koch-Henriksen
Risk of multiple sclerosis in nurse anaesthetists
Multiple Sclerosis, August 1, 2003; 9(4): 427 - 428.
[PDF]

Home page
 Mult SclerHome page
T. Riise
Can we contract multiple sclerosis from our working environment?
Multiple Sclerosis, June 1, 2003; 9(3): 217 - 218.
[PDF]


Advertisement