This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Marrie, R. A. Articles by Vollmer, T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Marrie, R. A. Articles by Vollmer, T. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Predictors of alternative medicine use by multiple sclerosis patients

Mellen Center for MS Treatment and Research, U10, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA, marrier{at}ccf.org

Olympia Hadjimichael

Department of Neurology, Yale University Medical School, New Haven, USA

Timothy Vollmer

Division of Neurology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, USA

Objective: To determine the frequency of alternative medicine use among multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, and the factors which predict such use. Methods: We examined 20778 MS patients enrolled in the North A merican Research C onsortium on Multiple Sclerosis (NARC O MS) Patient Registry, residing in the USA. We used demographic and clinical data to create multivariate logistic regression models for i) lifetime use of any alternative medicine, ii) lifetime use of any alternative provider (A P), and iii) lifetime use of each of the three most common A P. Results: 20387 patients provided data regarding alternative medicine use. Lifetime use of any alternative medicine was 54% and current use was 30%. C hiropractors (51%), massage therapists (34%), and nutritionists (24%) were the most commonly used A P. In all five models, use of alternative medicine was most strongly predicted by use of a conventional provider, and more modestly by disease factors indicating more severe or prolonged disease. Predictive power of the models was poor (c-index =0.62-0.68), despite good fits for the data. Conclusions: Demographic factors play only a minimal role in predicting the use of alternative medicine in this MS population while disease factors play a slightly stronger role. There must be other factors involved that may include accessibility, social acceptability and cultural factors. G iven the frequency of alternative medicine use by this patient population, further characterization of these factors is important.

Key Words: alternative medicine • cross-sectional • epidemiology • multiple sclerosis • predictors

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Marrie, R Horwitz, G Cutter, T Tyry, D Campagnolo, and T Vollmer Comorbidity, socioeconomic status and multiple sclerosis Multiple Sclerosis, September 1, 2008; 14(8): 1091 - 1098. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S Schwarz, C Knorr, H Geiger, and P Flachenecker Complementary and alternative medicine for multiple sclerosis Multiple Sclerosis, September 1, 2008; 14(8): 1113 - 1119. [Abstract] [PDF]

				V. S. Eschiti Lesson From Comparison of CAM Use by Women With Female-Specific Cancers to Others: It's Time to Focus on Interaction Risks With CAM Therapies Integr Cancer Ther, December 1, 2007; 6(4): 313 - 344. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L Shinto, V Yadav, C Morris, J A Lapidus, A Senders, and D Bourdette Demographic and health-related factors associated with complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use in multiple sclerosis Multiple Sclerosis, February 1, 2006; 12(1): 94 - 100. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Wesselius, D. J. Heersema, J. P. Mostert, M. Heerings, F. Admiraal-Behloul, A. Talebian, M. A. van Buchem, and J. De Keyser A randomized crossover study of bee sting therapy for multiple sclerosis Neurology, December 13, 2005; 65(11): 1764 - 1768. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]