Interferon beta preparations for the treatment of multiple sclerosis patients differ in neutralizing antibody seroprevalence and immunogenicity

¹ Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Neurology R54, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden
² Department of Neurology, Medical Center, Ljubljana, Slovenia
³ Department of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Austria

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed.

	Abstract

Development of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) reduces the clinical efficacy of interferon beta (IFNbeta) treatment in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate NAb seroprevalence (frequency of patients with NAbs) and immunogenicity (titer levels) of IFNbeta preparations in a clinical setting. We analysed 1115 consecutive MS patients, treated with one of the three available IFNbeta preparations, for an average of 40 months (1-120 months), for the presence of NAbs with the MxA protein induction assay. Overall, 32% of patients were positive for NAbs with neutralizing titers above 10. The frequency of NAbs, ie, the seroprevalence, was 13% in Avonex-treated patients, 43% for Betaferon, 39% for Rebif22 and 30% for Rebif44. In addition, the potential to induce high titer levels, ie, the immunogenicity, was observed to differ between preparations. Avonex, showing the lowest seroprevalence, also showed low immunogenicity and typically induced low titers. Betaferon, showing the highest seroprevalence when inducing NAbs, induced lower titers compared to Rebif22 and Rebif44. Treatment duration over five years only marginally correlated with decreased seroprevalence and titer levels. In conclusion, NAbs to IFNbeta are common in a clinical setting and the IFNbeta preparations differ not only in NAb seroprevalence, but also in immunogenicity.

Key Words: immunogenicity, interferon beta, multiple sclerosis, neutralizing antibodies, seroprevalence

First published on January 29, 2007, doi:10.1177/1352458506070762

Multiple Sclerosis 2007;13:208.

A more recent version of this article appeared on March 1, 2007


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. R. Pachner, J. D. Warth, A. Pace, S. Goelz, and On behalf of the INSIGHT investigators Effect of neutralizing antibodies on biomarker responses to interferon beta: The INSIGHT study Neurology, November 3, 2009; 73(18): 1493 - 1500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. C. Reingold, J. P. Steiner, C. H. Polman, J. A. Cohen, M. S. Freedman, L. Kappos, A. J. Thompson, and J. S. Wolinsky The challenge of follow-on biologics for treatment of multiple sclerosis Neurology, August 18, 2009; 73(7): 552 - 559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N Koch-Henriksen, P. Sorensen, K Bendtzen, and E. Flachs The clinical effect of neutralizing antibodies against interferon-beta is independent of the type of interferon-beta used for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis Multiple Sclerosis, May 1, 2009; 15(5): 601 - 605. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G Giovannoni, O Barbarash, F Casset-Semanaz, J King, L Metz, G Pardo, J Simsarian, P. Sorensen, B Stubinski, and on behalf of the Rebif(R) New Formulation Study Gr Safety and immunogenicity of a new formulation of interferon {beta}-1a (Rebif(R) New Formulation) in a Phase IIIb study in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis: 96-week results Multiple Sclerosis, February 1, 2009; 15(2): 219 - 228. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Soelberg Sorensen Review: Neutralizing antibodies against interferon-beta Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders, September 1, 2008; 1(2): 125 - 141. [Abstract] [PDF]