Multiple Sclerosis

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1352458507082607v1
1352458507082607v2
14/3/383    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldman, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goldman, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, J. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
First published on October 17, 2007, doi:10.1177/1352458507082607

Multiple Sclerosis 2008;14:383.

A more recent version of this article appeared on April 1, 2008
This version was published on January 31, 2008


Article

Evaluation of the six-minute walk in multiple sclerosis subjects and healthy controls

Myla D. Goldman1*, Ruth Ann Marrie2, and J. A. Cohen2

1 Department of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA
2 The Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.


   Abstract

Objective To assess the characteristics of the 6-min walk (6MW) in multiple sclerosis (MS) subjects of varied disability, and controls. To assess the correlation of 6MW to subjective measures of fatigue, health status and ambulation using the modified fatigue impact scale (MFIS), short form-36 Health Questionnaire physical component score and MS walking scale (MSWS).

Methods Forty MS expanded disability status scale [(EDSS) 0–6.5] and 20 control subjects were recruited from a MS outpatient clinic. Subjects completed survey material and three 6MWs with 1-h interval rest in a single study visit.

Results There was no practice effect or fatigability with repeat 6MW tests with a one-h rest period between test sessions. The 6MW had excellent intra-[intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)=0.95] and inter-rater (ICC=0.91) reliability. MS subjects demonstrated reduced 6MW distance and speed compared with controls (P<0.0001). Within the MS population 6MW distance was significantly reduced with increasing disability (P=0.05). Compared with the EDSS, the 6MW had a stronger correlation to subjective measures of ambulation and physical fatigue: MSWS (r=-0.81 versus 0.69) and MFISphy (0.66 versus 0.63).

Conclusions The 6MW is a feasible, reproducible, and reliable measure in MS. MS subjects demonstrate motor fatigue in both 6MW distance and speed compared with controls. In MS subjects there is an inverse relationship between motor fatigue and disability. 6MW has a strong correlation to subjective measures of ambulation and physical fatigue.

Key Words: six-minute walk; motor fatigue; outcome measures; multiple sclerosis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?