This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1352458508090667v1 14/7/954    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Paul, L Articles by McFadyen, A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Paul, L Articles by McFadyen, A Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Multiple Sclerosis Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The effect of functional electrical stimulation on the physiological cost of gait in people with multiple sclerosis

¹ Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Care, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
² School of Health and Social Care, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
³ MS Service, NHS Ayrshire and Arran, Scotland, UK
⁴ School of Engineering and Computing, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland, UK

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed.

	Abstract

Functional electrical stimulation (FES) is used clinically in the management of drop foot in people suffering from neurological conditions. The aim of the study was to investigate the effects of FES, in terms of speed and physiological cost of gait, in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). Twelve pwMS and 12 healthy matched controls walked at their own preferred walking speed (PWS) for 5 min around a 10 m elliptical course. Subjects with MS completed the protocol with and without using their FES. In addition, control subjects completed the protocol twice more walking at the same PWS of the pwMS to which they were matched. Wearing FES lead to a significant improvement in walking speed (0.49 ms^-1 and 0.43 ms^-1 with and without their FES respectively; P < 0.001) and a significant reduction in the physiological cost of gait (0.41 mL min^-1 -1 m^-1 and 0.46 mL min^-1 -1 m^-1 with and without FES respectively; P = 0.017) in pwMS. The speed of walking, oxygen uptake, and physiological cost were significantly different between pwMS and controls both at preferred and matched speeds. Although pwMS exhibit a higher physiological cost of walking, FES offers an orthotic benefit to pwMS and should be considered as a possible treatment option.

Key Words: functional electrical stimulation, gait, multiple sclerosis, outcome measure, physiological cost, rehabilitation

First published on June 23, 2008, doi:10.1177/1352458508090667

Multiple Sclerosis 2008;14:954.

A more recent version of this article appeared on August 1, 2008


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?