This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1352458508096687v1 1352458508096687v2 15/1/50    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Gajofatto, A Articles by Waubant, E Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gajofatto, A Articles by Waubant, E Pubmed/NCBI databases Compound via MeSH Substance via MeSH Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Switching first-line disease-modifying therapy after failure: impact on the course of relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis

¹ Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA; Department of Neurological and Vision Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
² Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
³ Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
⁴ Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed.

	Abstract

Background

Options for non-responders to relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) first-line disease-modifying therapies (DMT) are limited. We explored whether switching first-line DMT is effective.

Methods

Patients with RRMS who first received interferon-beta (IFNB) or glatiramer acetate (GA) were classified in three categories: DMT change because of suboptimal response, DMT change because of other reasons, and no DMT change during follow-up. Outcomes included annualized relapse rate (ARR) and relapse-free proportions.

Results

We identified 597 patients who initiated first-line DMT. For patients who did not change DMT (n = 240), pre-DMT and on-DMT median ARR were 0.50 and 0 (P < 0.0001). At 24 months, 76% (95%CI = 69–81%) of patients who did not change DMT were relapse-free. Of the 155 who switched because of suboptimal response, 101 switched to another first-line DMT. Median ARR pre-DMT, on first DMT and second DMT were: 0.50, 0.55, and 0.25 for switchers from IFNB to GA (IFNB/GA, n = 12) (pre-DMT versus first DMT: P = 0.92; first versus second DMT: P = 0.31); 0.90, 0.50, and 0 for switchers from GA to IFNB (GA/IFNB, n = 18; P = 0.19; P = 0.01); 0.50, 0.68, and 0 for switchers from an IFNB to another IFNB (IFNB/IFNB', n = 71; P = 0.34; P = 0.02). Estimated relapse-free proportion after 24 months of treatment was 42% (95%CI=15–66%) during the period on IFNB versus 53% (95%CI = 17–80%) on GA for IFNB/GA (P = 0.21); 12% (95%CI = 0–40%) on GA versus 87% (95%CI = 59–97%) on IFNB for GA/IFNB (P = 0.001); and 41% (95%CI = 29–52%) on initial IFNB versus 67% (95%CI = 53–79%) on subsequent IFNB for IFNB/IFNB' (P = 0.0001).

Conclusions

Switching first-line DMT in patients with RRMS failing initial therapy may be effective in many cases.

Key Words: disease-modifying therapy, multiple sclerosis, therapy switch, treatment failure

First published on October 15, 2008, doi:10.1177/1352458508096687

Multiple Sclerosis 2009;15:50.

A more recent version of this article appeared on January 1, 2009
This version was published on November 21, 2008


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. K Coyle, J. F Foley, E. J Fox, D. R Jeffery, F. E Munschauer III, and C. Tornatore Best practice recommendations for the selection and management of patients with multiple sclerosis receiving natalizumab therapy Multiple Sclerosis, November 1, 2009; 15(4_suppl): S26 - S36. [Abstract] [PDF]