This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1352458509105230v1 15/7/869    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Khan, F Articles by Simmonds, F Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Khan, F Articles by Simmonds, F Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Multiple Sclerosis Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Multiple sclerosis rehabilitation outcomes: analysis of a national casemix data set from Australia

¹ Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
² Kings College London School of Medicine, London, UK
³ Australasian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre, Centre for Health Service Development, University of Wollongong, Australia

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed.

	Abstract

Objective

To examine the outcomes of inpatient rehabilitation for persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS), using the Australian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre (AROC) database.

Method

Deidentified data from the AROC database were analyzed for all rehabilitation admissions during 2003–2007, using four classes for functional level. The outcomes included Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores and efficiency, hospital length of stay (LOS), and discharge destination.

Results

Of 1010 case episodes, 70% were women, admitted from home (n = 851) and discharged into the community (n = 890), and 97% (n = 986) were in the higher three classes for functional level (classes 216, 217, and 218). Majority of the more disabled pwMS were treated in the public hospital system, with a longer LOS compared with private facilities (P < 0.001). The FIM for classes 216–218 showed significant functional improvement during the admission (P < 0.001), and those in higher classes showed less change (likely due to higher FIM admission scores). FIM efficiency was significantly higher in class 217 than other classes (P < 0.001). The year-on-year trend was toward reducing hospital LOS and FIM efficiency, but these did not reach significance (P = 0.107, P = 0.634).

Conclusion

The AROC data set is useful for describing rehabilitation outcomes for pwMS. However, additional information needs to be collected to evaluate nature of services provided and service implications.

Key Words: Australian rehabilitation outcomes centre data set, function, measurement, outcomes, rehabilitation

First published on May 22, 2009, doi:10.1177/1352458509105230

Multiple Sclerosis 2009;15:869.

A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?