This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1352458507084649v1 1352458507084649v2 14/4/500    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Sauter, C. Articles by Vass, K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sauter, C. Articles by Vass, K. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A longitudinal study on effects of a six-week course for energy conservation for multiple sclerosis patients

University Clinic of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany, cornelia.sauter{at}charite.de

K. Zebenholzer

University Clinic of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

J. Hisakawa

Fonds Soziales Wien, Vienna, Austria

J. Zeitlhofer

University Clinic of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

K. Vass

University Clinic of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Objective Fatigue management and energy conservation are effective strategies to minimize fatigue in multiple sclerosis (MS). Sustained results have not yet been reported.

Methods A fatigue management course was provided for 32 MS patients. They were tested prior to, directly after participation in the course and in a 7—9 month follow-up with the Fatigue Severity Scale, the MS-specific Fatigue Scale, the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS), the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and a self-rating scale for depression. The Expanded Disability Status Score (EDSS) and the MS functional composite (MSFC) were evaluated before and after participation in the course.

Results The total score and the Cognitive and Physical subscores of the MFIS showed significant improvements on both points of time. Scores in the Fatigue Severity Scale, MS-specific Fatigue Scale and Psychosocial Fatigue Impact Scale did not improve significantly. MS functional composite and EDSS remained unchanged after six weeks of course participation. Subjective sleep quality improved directly after participation in the course and after 7—9 months. The depression score decreased significantly to a normal level at the end of training and in the 7—9 month follow-up.

Conclusion Fatigue management enables MS patients to cope with their fatigue and energy more effectively. Follow-up evaluations showed stable results after 7—9 months. Multiple Sclerosis 2008; 14: 500—505. http://msj.sagepub.com

Key Words: depression • fatigue management • multiple sclerosis • sleep quality

This version was published on May 1, 2008

Multiple Sclerosis, Vol. 14, No. 4, 500-505 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1352458507084649


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?